EU AI Act Article 4 · enforcement from 2 August 2026

An Auditor Asks Who You Trained On AI. You Have Nothing Dated.

Article 4 has applied since February 2025, but national authorities start supervising and enforcing it on 2 August 2026. The evidence they ask for is not a policy document — it is a dated, role-mapped record of who was trained, on what, and when. Most marketing teams have a Slack thread and a signed acknowledgement.

Buy Now — $19

One-time payment · works offline · nothing leaves your browser

57.6%
of teams use AI with no governing policy at all
(Brafton survey, May 2026)
23%
of marketing teams have a formal AI usage policy
(Gartner)
2 Aug
market surveillance authorities begin enforcing
Article 4 in 2026

A read-receipt is not evidence

The Digital Omnibus softened Article 4 from an obligation of result to one of effort — but it did not move the date. That makes the documentation itself the test. This app produces the artefact, not another training course.

1

Everyone who touches AI on your behalf

Article 4 covers "other persons dealing with the operation and use of AI systems" for you — so freelancers, contractors and agency partners are in scope and flagged separately, because they are the population no HR system tracks.

2

Roles mapped to a literacy tier

Nineteen role types map to Tier 1 Aware, Tier 2 Operator or Tier 3 Configurer/Procurer, raised automatically for anyone who configures tools or runs client data through them. Override any assignment and the reason is recorded — a considered judgement is itself evidence.

3

Gaps you can act on this week

Four explicit flags: nobody with no record at all, anyone whose logged training falls short of their tier, overdue or stale records, and every external partner listed on their own. With a documented-versus-undocumented headline number.

4

A printable evidence pack

Register table, per-person sheets, coverage-by-tier summary and an editable measures-taken statement, laid out as one clean dated document. Print it or save it as a PDF and the file is your answer to the question.

What it looks like

A five-person team, two of them external. The gaps sort themselves.

Northbank Marketing Ltd — AI literacy register
as at 31 Jul 2026
5
In the register
4
Documented
1
Undocumented
3
Need action
NameTypeRequiredCoveredLast trainedStatus
Dana WhitfieldContent writer StaffTier 2Tier 227 Apr 2026 Current
Marcus ReillyMarketing ops / martech StaffTier 3Tier 126 Jun 2025 Overdue
Priya NandakumarDesigner / creative FreelancerTier 2None Never recorded
Tom AldertonExecutive / leadership StaffTier 1Tier 124 Sep 2025 Due soon
Sable CreativePaid media / PPC Agency partnerTier 2Tier 23 Mar 2026 Review required
Marcus reached Tier 1 but configures tools and handles client data, so he needs Tier 3. Sable's AI stack changed since their last session, which marks the record stale regardless of the date.

The market's answer to Article 4 is an annual per-seat LMS contract that takes weeks to roll out, or a blank template with no logic in it. There is no mandated template and nothing in between. This is the in-between: $19, once, and you have the register by the end of the afternoon.

One file. One payment.

Buy it, open it, fill it in. No account, no subscription, no seat count.

AI Literacy Compliance Log
$19
One-time purchase
Yours to keep. No renewal, no per-seat pricing.
  • People register covering staff, contractors, freelancers and agency partners
  • Role-to-tier mapping across 19 role types, with recorded overrides
  • Dated training log: topic, date, format, delivered by, depth reached
  • Gap analysis with four flags and a documented-vs-undocumented count
  • Refresh clocks with current / due soon / overdue / never bands
  • Printable evidence pack with an editable measures-taken statement
  • CSV export plus JSON backup, import and merge
  • Installs to your phone or desktop and works fully offline
Buy Now — $19
Instant access after payment. Runs entirely in your browser — no names or notes are ever uploaded.

Before you buy

We're not in the EU. Does this apply to us?

Possibly. Article 3(4) makes anyone using an AI system in a professional context a deployer, and the Act reaches non-EU deployers whose AI output is used in the Union — so a US agency with one European client is inside the perimeter. Even where it isn't, the register is the same artefact a client's procurement team asks for.

Is this a training course?

No, and that's the point. It is the record-keeping half that the courses don't give you. Log whatever training you already do — a live session, a written brief, a vendor course — and the app turns it into a dated, role-mapped, printable register.

Where does the data go?

Nowhere. It is a single HTML file that stores everything in your own browser. You are typing in staff names and tool usage, so that matters. Export a JSON backup or CSV whenever you want a copy.

Is this legal advice?

No. It is a record-keeping aid. The tiers it suggests are a practical starting point you are expected to review and adjust, and the app says so on every screen and in the printed pack.