Connecticut’s new AI law requires written notice of key subscription terms — usage limits, feature restrictions, your right to degrade the service, renewal terms — before every AI subscription starts or renews. Enforcement is the Attorney General, at up to $5,000 per wilful violation. The answer to “which of our products are covered” is currently spread across your checkout flow, your ToS and three people’s memories.
Buy Now — $19One-time payment · works offline · nothing leaves your browser
Buried in Connecticut’s 2026 omnibus AI act is a provision nobody’s checkout flow was built for: any business offering AI technology to a Connecticut consumer on a subscription basis must give written notice of key subscription terms before the subscription begins — and before it renews. The notice has to cover:
Enforced exclusively by the Connecticut Attorney General as an unfair trade practice under CUTPA. Effective 1 October 2026. Per violation matters: an undisclosed limit on a product with thousands of CT subscribers is not one problem.
There is no generated wording and no template notice in this app, on purpose — what your notice should say is a question for your counsel. What this holds is the operational answer: which subscription products have a delivered, dated notice covering all four elements, and which do not.
Pro Monthly and Team Annual carry different limits and different renewal terms, so they are different records. Each one holds the notice’s delivery method, delivery date, and what it actually says about each required element — evidence, not vibes.
An element nobody has checked against the delivered notice counts against the record, the same as one recorded missing. That is deliberate: the roster that looks clean because nobody looked is exactly the roster the AG’s office gets to look at first.
If you retain the right to swap models, throttle usage or sunset features mid-term, that discretion must be disclosed — it is the most AI-specific element of the law and the least likely to be in your current checkout flow. The register gives it its own line on every record.
Print the register to a dated PDF: summary, disclosure matrix, and a detail sheet per product. When the question is whether a violation was wilful, a maintained, dated record of what you disclosed and when is the difference between a gap and a wilful one.
Five subscription products from one AI company. The register bands them worst-first, so whatever needs fixing before 1 October is always at the top.
| Product | Type | Notice | Elements | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VoiceStack AI — CreatorAcquired product line, no notice produced yet | Auto-renewing | None | 0/4 | No notice |
| CopyForge AI — Team AnnualDiscretion clause in the MSA but not in the notice | Auto-renewing | On record | 3/4 | Notice incomplete |
| PromptPilot — StarterTwo elements never checked against the notice | Auto-renewing | On record | 2/4 | Notice incomplete |
| PromptPilot — Fixed 12-monthInitial term, renewal element not scored | Initial term | On record | 3/3 | Compliant |
| CopyForge AI — Pro MonthlyThe reference record: all four elements, dated | Auto-renewing | On record | 4/4 | Compliant |
Your options today are a compliance platform priced for enterprises with a general counsel, or a spreadsheet that does not know an unchecked element from a disclosed one. This is the thing in between: a purpose-built register for one new, dated, enforceable obligation — for $19, once, before the deadline does the auditing for you.
Buy it, open it, log your catalogue this afternoon. No account, no subscription, no seat count.
No, deliberately. There is no template wording and no generated notice anywhere in it. What a legally adequate notice says for your products is a question for your counsel; this app records whether each product has one, what it covers, and when it was last checked.
The law looks at the consumer, not your registered office. If Connecticut consumers can buy an AI subscription from you, the notice obligation is in play. Whether and how it applies to your facts is your counsel’s call — the register is where you hold the answer once they make it.
That is exactly the question the register makes you answer per product rather than in general. The obligation is written notice of the specific terms before the subscription starts or renews — a clause somewhere in a ToS nobody is shown at checkout is the gap this law was written at. Record what the delivered notice actually says, element by element, and the band tells you where you stand.
The countdown flips to “in effect” and the register keeps working exactly the same — because the obligation is per subscription and per renewal, it never becomes a finished project. The 90-day review window keeps every compliant record honest as limits, tiers and renewal flows change.
Nowhere. It is a single HTML file that stores everything in your own browser. You will be typing in product names, terms and internal notes, so that matters. Export a JSON backup or a CSV whenever you want a copy.