Voice clone & likeness consent register

The Release You Had Them Sign Probably Is Not Consent Any More

Since AB 2602, a digital-replica clause that does not describe the intended use with reasonable specificity is unenforceable — so the broad release in your standard talent agreement covers less than you think. AB 1836 added estate consent for deceased personalities on 1 January 2026, with a $10,000 statutory minimum per violation. This is the register that tracks which performers you actually have covered: the use, the media, the term, and every consent that has since been withdrawn.

Buy Now — $19 One-time payment · no subscription · works offline
Specificity test per record Revoked-but-live alerts Estate consent branch Term and territory tracking Printable evidence pack

What the register tells you at a glance

Every performer gets a band and a reason, not just a row. The dashboard shows how much of your replica work is genuinely covered today, and which records are one phone call away from being a problem.

33%
Specific consent held 6 performers logged · 4 replicas still running · as at 20 August 2026 1 consent was revoked this month and the radio spots are still in rotation
Written instrument on file
67%
Passes specificity test
33%
Usage inside consented term
50%
Performers ranked by exposure
Revoked, liveIvo Brandt — voice clone withdrawn after the model was reused for a competitor, radio spots still running
No instrumentDelphine Okonjo — deceased personality, estate consent is a phone call with the trustee and nothing signed
Thin consentTeodor Vance — signed release names no channels and no end date, so the specificity test fails
Term lapsedCasper Lund — out-of-home sites were never taken down when the term ended in January
CoveredRosalind Achebe — SAG-AFTRA rider, use, media and term all described and confirmed against the live cut

Why a consent register and not a folder of signed PDFs

A folder tells you a document exists. This works out whether the document actually covers what you have running, and says so in a sentence you can hand to someone.

§

The specificity test, applied

Use, media and term are captured as three separate facts, then confirmed against what is actually in flight. All three described and matching scores as covered. Any one missing or unconfirmed scores as thin — boilerplate risk, even with a signature on file.

Revocation is a first-class field

Consent can be withdrawn, and the worst position to be in is material still running after it was. A revoked consent with no past usage end date is the register's most severe band, above everything else on the dashboard.

A separate branch for estates

Deceased-personality records run the same test against the estate instrument rather than a performer signature, and stay visibly distinct in the register and the exported pack so the two are never conflated in a review.

An evidence pack, not a screenshot

Print a dated pack per performer with the instrument, the described use, the confirmations and the assessment. CSV for the compliance file, JSON for a backup you can reload later.

Built for the team commissioning the replica

Not for counsel, and not for a rights-management platform priced per seat for a studio.

Agencies producing AI voice work

You are the one synthesising the read. Keep one register across clients and know, before the client asks, which voices you can defend and which you cannot.

Brand and content teams

Digital doubles and synthetic presenters accumulate quietly across campaigns. One row per performer per usage keeps the picture honest as the work multiplies.

Producers and talent coordinators

Track what the rider says against what is in flight, spot the term ending in sixty days, and chase the renewal before something is left running on a lapsed consent.

Anyone facing a client audit

The useful artefact is a dated register showing what you held, for which use, and when. Print it, attach it to the delivery, and move on.

“We have a signed release. We are fine.”

That sentence was true in 2023. The digital-replica statutes that followed — California AB 2602 and AB 1836, the Tennessee ELVIS Act, and the 2026 SAG-AFTRA Digital Replica Rider as a contract overlay — converge on the same test: written, specific about the use, and still in force. A broad release signed years ago meets none of those, and nobody finds out until the performer, the estate or the client asks.

One self-contained HTML file. No accounts, no API keys, no network calls, nothing uploaded. It installs to your phone or desktop home screen, works offline, and every record stays in your own browser. Built by Mulkern AI Systems, who ship AI operations tooling for marketing teams.

A structured record-keeping aid, not legal advice. It holds no consent wording and drafts none — it finds the gaps so you know what to take to counsel.

$19
One-time purchase · lifetime access · no subscription
  • Unlimited performers across brands and clients
  • One record per performer × usage, voice or likeness or both
  • Specificity test across described use, media and term
  • Live-deployment confirmation against each described fact
  • Five alert bands, most severe first
  • Revoked-but-still-live flagged above everything else
  • Separate estate-consent branch for deceased personalities
  • Instrument type, signing date and document location recorded
  • Independent representation captured on every signature
  • Term, territory and usage-end tracking with lapse alerts
  • Search, filter by band or record type, risk-first sorting
  • Printable evidence pack per performer, dated
  • Export as CSV or JSON backup, and re-import
  • Installable PWA — works fully offline
  • Light and dark themes, mobile-ready
Buy Now — $19

Instant access after checkout. No refunds. All sales are final.